Straits Pension Regs,
&
the provise to
am
the clause was intended to deprive officer of the right to clann addn, for. P. 2. where those qualns.
had been in a
great
any.
measure obtained
in the public service. (see passage
sked
on
h.26
thar, $of desp
of pointed enclosure in
||
The question is,
Setarts). 14778787 bounds. Rumsey
в
Avas
"transferred to the
service of the colony from
H. M's Naval
Military sexince", having regard
the fact that he was
direct (age 11720/02).
not transferred
I submit
to
however that we are entitled to interpret
this rule with some
it's intention was
an Bx-
latitude
though the clause
ion at least
as well as
けろと
Jconstruction
straits,
Anyhow
446 437
may
not have been
happily worded, it bears that construct
struction,
biginity
the other con
that where there is arn -
are
liberty to go back
to the draftsmand for enlightenment,
we have in the case
ladot down in
that the rule meano
Unfortunately
A above.
authority
Raw
doop on 3 5 2 6
the drafts on 14778/87
4 35268/00, but I have you
to
will now
yours
reconsider the views im
I allow that the D.fS.
be able
minute above,
35268700
desh. on
CO
rightly advised.
पै
y that as
clearly to prevent
naval officer from claiming
of the
35268/60
what I
ao at
mo
legal
PQ. we
shd. lay
down
that bommar
has no
claim to
addition
amy
Rumsey
3. If however he is entitled to
I still think he is only
addn. of 2 you, for the
any entitled to
addition,
season?
JJ will be seen Straits
that the
fr.
following
par. 5 of dest on
14778/87
present wording of the rule was devised
with the express intention of providing
that the addn.
on
to be made was
to deford
the position of the post to wh he
wras
first apped, & not on that fr wh. he finally retired, and I submit that
A
15
hur Cox
1.
I assumed
With see, and to the particules case of Commander Ruminy, insuriting my
first minuti, that it was considered that he did not within the proviso to clarse 3(2) of the Prusion Minuli.
Corne The axe
1--0
it would
of the word "traumfined" is perhaps unfortunate. appres at frist back to point to direct transfer. But, on considering the matter carefully, I cannot see any
m
reasmette garend
which a retired militurgy or naval offices should be build sutitled officer Frano me directly from the
to benefits not accorded to an
f
military or naval service of the Crown to the Colonial service. Moreover, pary of our desp. on 14778/8, makes it clear that the
intention of the proviso
to exclude all militare, & navel Affair when protessional qualifications have been in a
red in the public servic think it is "pity that this intention
mea ours are
great
Eat the
not
ian17
clearly
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.